Case Study

$3.5 Million Power Plant Financing in West Virginia

Furnace Re-Engineering for a West Virginia Coal-Fired Plant

Read This If

Furnace Re-Engineering for a West Virginia Coal-Fired Plant

Primary Detail

Investor Profile

Main Constraint

The plant faced an urgent equipment need, but financing options were severely limited.

1. Investor Profile

Furnace Re-Engineering for a West Virginia Coal-Fired Plant

A West Virginia coal-fired power plant needed to re-engineer a critical furnace unit to maintain operations and continue supplying power to its local customer base. But in a lending environment shaped by political pressure against coal-fired energy, traditional banks would not engage in discussions.

Commercial Funding Partners secured a $3.5 million, 48-month lease for the new unit, giving the plant a path forward when conventional financing was effectively unavailable.

2. The Challenge

The plant faced an urgent equipment need, but financing options were severely limited.

Traditional lenders were unwilling to participate because of the borrower’s coal-related operations, regardless of the project’s practical importance to the plant and the surrounding community. The company needed to move forward with a furnace re-engineering project, but access to capital had become the primary obstacle.

Key challenges included:

• Political pressure surrounding coal-fired generation
• Banks refusing to engage in financing discussions
• A critical equipment upgrade that could not be delayed
• The need to preserve ongoing power production for local customers

3. The CFP Solution

Commercial Funding Partners structured and delivered a financing solution tailored to the project’s realities rather than the broader market’s reluctance.

We secured a 48-month lease totaling $3.5 million for the new furnace unit, allowing the plant to complete the re-engineering project without relying on institutions that had already stepped away from the opportunity.

4. The structure was designed to:

• Finance essential power generation equipment
• Work around traditional bank resistance
• Support the plant’s operational continuity
• Align payments with the company’s business needs

5. The Result

With financing in place, the power plant moved forward with the furnace re-engineering project and maintained its ability to serve local demand.

Results included:

• $3.5 million funded
• 48-month lease secured
• Critical furnace unit re-engineered
• Continued power supply to local customers
• Successful closing despite a highly restrictive lending environment

6. Why This Transaction Matters

Not every viable project fits inside a traditional bank credit box.

In sectors facing political, regulatory, or reputational pressure, strong companies can still have legitimate capital needs tied to essential infrastructure and ongoing operations. This transaction demonstrates how specialized equipment financing can help a borrower move forward when banks refuse to participate.

7. Need Financing Where Banks Won’t Engage?

Disclosure: This case study is anonymized unless CFP has approved a specific public descriptor. Customer names and non-approved identifying details are withheld. Financing availability, structure, timing, and terms depend on borrower qualifications, collateral, documentation, and final underwriting.